Telaah dimensi proses kognitif pada soal pengayaan buku teks bahasa Korea untuk penutur asing Researching the dimension of cognitive process in the enrichment of Korean textbook for foreign speakers
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 15, 2023
Keywords:
cognitive process dimension, Bloom’s taxonomy, enrichment question
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to assess the application of cognitive processing dimensions to the enrichment questions in the Korean book entitled 아하 한국어 2/Aha Hanguko 2 which contains 141 questions in 12 chapters. The cognitive process dimension is divided into six levels with two categories, namely lower order thinking skills and higher order thinking skills. The method used in this research is qualitative by using textual analysis. The results of the research in the book are that the enrichment questions do not yet contain all levels of cognitive process dimensions because there are no questions at the C5 - Evaluation level. However, there are still questions with other higher order thinking skills categories, namely levels C4 - Analysis and C6 - Creating. The enrichment questions are still dominated by the level C2 - Understanding which is a category of lower order thinking skills. Based on the results of the research, it can be seen that the book does not contain enrichment questions with the level of dimensions of cognitive processes that are included in the category of higher order thinking skills optimally. This can have an impact on the lack of sharpening of students' critical thinking skills.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Zulianty, A. R., Samsudin, D., Triarisanti, R., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). Telaah dimensi proses kognitif pada soal pengayaan buku teks bahasa Korea untuk penutur asing. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6(3), 815-826. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.706
Issue
Section
Articles
Every work in Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internationalthat allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Abdullah S., Susilo, & Mulawarman, W. G. (2022). Analisis Kelayakan Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia untuk Siswa Kelas VIII Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(3), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i3.433
Agustina, T., Suwandi, S., & Suyitno, S. (2021). The Dimension of the Higher Order Thinking Cognitive Process in Indonesian Language Teaching Textbook for Senior High School Students. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(12), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3161
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objective. Longman.
Aprillia, A., Qadar, R., & Efwinda, S. (2023). Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Questions in Indonesian High School Physics Textbooks. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.93
Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook’s Questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p100
Atiullah, K., Wuli Fitriati, S., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Year X of High School. English Education Journal, 9(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v9i4.31794
Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A. M., Mpolomoka, D. M., Chikopela, R., & Mushibwe, C. (2023). Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Categorization of Cognitive Process Development in Colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/14-4-02
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co, Inc.
Cheng, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2021). A Cognitive Level Evaluation Method Based on a Deep Neural Network for Online Learning: From a Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognition Objectives Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661235
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th edition). SAGE Publication.
Ebadi, S., & Mozafari, V. (2016). Exploring Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in TPSOL Textbooks. Journal of Teaching Persian Language to Non-Persian Speakers, 5(1), 65–93. https://jtpsol.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_995.html
Harahap, N. A. S., & Natsir, M. (2021). Prioritizing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on the 2013 Curriculum on Language Learning Evaluation at The Tertiary Level Education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research (IJESSR), 2(1), 138–146. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ijessr/article/view/6412
Hidayatusholikah, N., Hasanudin, C., & Rohman, N. (2023). Analisis Keterampilan Menulis Puisi dengan Menggunakan Metode Quantum Learning. Journal of Literature and Education, 1(1), 9–18. https://jurnal.hiskikaltim.org/index.php/jle/article/view/7
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018, November 10). Mendikbud Imbau Guru Terus Kembangkan Model Pembelajaran HOTS. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/11/mendikbud-imbau-guru-terus-kembangkan-model-pembelajaran-hots
Listeani, F. Y., Safi’i, I., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Kelayakan Instrumen Evaluasi Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.216
Mariyam, T., Kazmi, S., & Ali, R. I. (2020). Evaluation of English Textbook Exercises of Punjab Textbook Board for Grade 10 in the Light of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of 2001. Global Language Review, 5(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).18
McKee, A. (2001). A Beginner’s Guide to Textual Analysis. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine, 127/128, 138–149. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41993/2/41993.pdf
Mizbani, M., & Chalak, A. (2017). Analyzing Listening and Speaking Activities of Iranian EFL Textbook Prospect 3 through Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.38
Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Primary Leaving English Exam Questions in Rwandan Schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2
Mujayanah, S., Indah, D. R., Prihantini, A. F., & Setyowati, Y. (2022). “HOTS” in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Secondary School (Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Study). Budapest International Research and Crititcs Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 23767–23778. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6390
Nurhasanah, A., Nugraha, F. F., & Wijayatna, S. A. (2023). Analysis HOTS Content in Erlangga Straight Point Series (ESPS) 5th Grade Mathematics Textbook Base on Bloom’s Taxonomy Theory. Journal of Educational Experts, 6(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.30740/jee.v6i1p66-75
Orwin, R. G., & Vevea, J. L. (1994). Evaluating Coding Decision. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Ed.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 139–162). Russel Sage Foundation.
Putri, A. D., & Astuti, I. M. J. (2014). Tata Letak Ilustrasi Ditinjau dari Segi Proporsional Ilustrasi pada Buku Pendamping Tematik Terpadu IPA Jilid 1 Sesuai Kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Erlangga. Publipreneur Polimed, 2(1), 66–79.
Rinjaya, D., & Halimi, S. S. (2022). An Evaluation of Indonesian Textbooks Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i1.5813
Samsudin, D., & Hardini, T. I. (2019). The Influence of Learning Styles and Metacognitive Skills on Student’s Critical Thinking in the Context of Student Creativity Program. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14750
Sanova, Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2017). Pengembangan Soal Pengayaan Matematika Online untuk Siswa Kelas X. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v3i1.331
Saputra, H. T., & Pujiati, H. (2021). Cognitive Domain of Revised Bloom Taxonomy in English Student Book. JELT (Journal Of English Language and Literature Teaching, 6(1), 61–66. http://ejournal.unima.ac.id/index.php/jellt/article/view/2816
Saputro, D., Sabardila, A., Prayitno, H. J., & Markhamah, M. (2021). Integrasi Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013 Berperspektif HOTS. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.168
Setyowati, Y., Susanto, S., & Munir, A. (2022). A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation of Formal Written Language Test Items. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(5), 1317–1331. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7296
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2021). Cognition and Academic Performance: Mediating Role of Personality Characteristics and Psychology Health. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774548
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Takasana, I. K. G. (2020). An Evaluation of Wh-Question in English in Mind Textbook an Bright an English Textbook Seen in Terms of Bloom’s New Taxonomy. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching), 5(2), 25–37. http://ejournal.unima.ac.id/index.php/jellt/article/view/2454/0
Triarisanti, R., Oktavianto, D. B., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Critical Thinking Abilities and Korean Reading Skills: to What Extent Do They Correlate? Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_76
Urgo, K., Arguello, J., & Capra, R. (2019). Anderson And Krathwohl’s Two-Dimensional Taxonomy Applied to Task Creation and Learning Assessment. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341981.3344226
Zahoor, A.W., Farooqui, S. I., Khan, A., Kazmi, S. A. M., Qamar, N., & Rizvi, J. (2023). Evaluation of Cognitive Domain in Objective Exam of Physiotherapy Teaching Program by Using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 13(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755447
Agustina, T., Suwandi, S., & Suyitno, S. (2021). The Dimension of the Higher Order Thinking Cognitive Process in Indonesian Language Teaching Textbook for Senior High School Students. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(12), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3161
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objective. Longman.
Aprillia, A., Qadar, R., & Efwinda, S. (2023). Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Questions in Indonesian High School Physics Textbooks. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v3i1.93
Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook’s Questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p100
Atiullah, K., Wuli Fitriati, S., & Rukmini, D. (2019). Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Year X of High School. English Education Journal, 9(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v9i4.31794
Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A. M., Mpolomoka, D. M., Chikopela, R., & Mushibwe, C. (2023). Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Categorization of Cognitive Process Development in Colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/14-4-02
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay Co, Inc.
Cheng, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2021). A Cognitive Level Evaluation Method Based on a Deep Neural Network for Online Learning: From a Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognition Objectives Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661235
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th edition). SAGE Publication.
Ebadi, S., & Mozafari, V. (2016). Exploring Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives in TPSOL Textbooks. Journal of Teaching Persian Language to Non-Persian Speakers, 5(1), 65–93. https://jtpsol.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_995.html
Harahap, N. A. S., & Natsir, M. (2021). Prioritizing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on the 2013 Curriculum on Language Learning Evaluation at The Tertiary Level Education in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research (IJESSR), 2(1), 138–146. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ijessr/article/view/6412
Hidayatusholikah, N., Hasanudin, C., & Rohman, N. (2023). Analisis Keterampilan Menulis Puisi dengan Menggunakan Metode Quantum Learning. Journal of Literature and Education, 1(1), 9–18. https://jurnal.hiskikaltim.org/index.php/jle/article/view/7
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018, November 10). Mendikbud Imbau Guru Terus Kembangkan Model Pembelajaran HOTS. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2018/11/mendikbud-imbau-guru-terus-kembangkan-model-pembelajaran-hots
Listeani, F. Y., Safi’i, I., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). Kelayakan Instrumen Evaluasi Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.216
Mariyam, T., Kazmi, S., & Ali, R. I. (2020). Evaluation of English Textbook Exercises of Punjab Textbook Board for Grade 10 in the Light of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of 2001. Global Language Review, 5(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2020(V-II).18
McKee, A. (2001). A Beginner’s Guide to Textual Analysis. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine, 127/128, 138–149. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/41993/2/41993.pdf
Mizbani, M., & Chalak, A. (2017). Analyzing Listening and Speaking Activities of Iranian EFL Textbook Prospect 3 through Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.38
Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Primary Leaving English Exam Questions in Rwandan Schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2
Mujayanah, S., Indah, D. R., Prihantini, A. F., & Setyowati, Y. (2022). “HOTS” in Reading Comprehension Questions of English Textbook for Secondary School (Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Study). Budapest International Research and Crititcs Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3), 23767–23778. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6390
Nurhasanah, A., Nugraha, F. F., & Wijayatna, S. A. (2023). Analysis HOTS Content in Erlangga Straight Point Series (ESPS) 5th Grade Mathematics Textbook Base on Bloom’s Taxonomy Theory. Journal of Educational Experts, 6(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.30740/jee.v6i1p66-75
Orwin, R. G., & Vevea, J. L. (1994). Evaluating Coding Decision. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Ed.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 139–162). Russel Sage Foundation.
Putri, A. D., & Astuti, I. M. J. (2014). Tata Letak Ilustrasi Ditinjau dari Segi Proporsional Ilustrasi pada Buku Pendamping Tematik Terpadu IPA Jilid 1 Sesuai Kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Erlangga. Publipreneur Polimed, 2(1), 66–79.
Rinjaya, D., & Halimi, S. S. (2022). An Evaluation of Indonesian Textbooks Using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v16i1.5813
Samsudin, D., & Hardini, T. I. (2019). The Influence of Learning Styles and Metacognitive Skills on Student’s Critical Thinking in the Context of Student Creativity Program. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14750
Sanova, Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2017). Pengembangan Soal Pengayaan Matematika Online untuk Siswa Kelas X. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v3i1.331
Saputra, H. T., & Pujiati, H. (2021). Cognitive Domain of Revised Bloom Taxonomy in English Student Book. JELT (Journal Of English Language and Literature Teaching, 6(1), 61–66. http://ejournal.unima.ac.id/index.php/jellt/article/view/2816
Saputro, D., Sabardila, A., Prayitno, H. J., & Markhamah, M. (2021). Integrasi Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013 Berperspektif HOTS. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 4(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.168
Setyowati, Y., Susanto, S., & Munir, A. (2022). A Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Evaluation of Formal Written Language Test Items. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(5), 1317–1331. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7296
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2021). Cognition and Academic Performance: Mediating Role of Personality Characteristics and Psychology Health. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774548
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Takasana, I. K. G. (2020). An Evaluation of Wh-Question in English in Mind Textbook an Bright an English Textbook Seen in Terms of Bloom’s New Taxonomy. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching), 5(2), 25–37. http://ejournal.unima.ac.id/index.php/jellt/article/view/2454/0
Triarisanti, R., Oktavianto, D. B., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Critical Thinking Abilities and Korean Reading Skills: to What Extent Do They Correlate? Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022), 485–489. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_76
Urgo, K., Arguello, J., & Capra, R. (2019). Anderson And Krathwohl’s Two-Dimensional Taxonomy Applied to Task Creation and Learning Assessment. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341981.3344226
Zahoor, A.W., Farooqui, S. I., Khan, A., Kazmi, S. A. M., Qamar, N., & Rizvi, J. (2023). Evaluation of Cognitive Domain in Objective Exam of Physiotherapy Teaching Program by Using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU, 13(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755447